Reasoning About Morality and Values Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Reasoning About Morality and Values - Essay Example Conflict that the law offers to safety establishes ground for moral dilemma in the war against terror to generate the moral debate on rights actions into people’s security. The law provides for liberty, a right that is further applicable under international law, and is the source of the moral debate on torture of suspected terrorists. The moral dilemma is whether to torture a suspect for information that can be used to protection potential victims or respect the law that protects people from torture. Richard Posner, a justice of the United States Court of Appeal, offers an argument on the moral debate and notes that torturing a criminal, who is probably guilty, is justified for protection of an innocent victim (Gordon, 2014). The argument can be presented as follows. One of the strengths of the argument is it protection for innocent victims because torturing a suspected criminal is likely to reveal information for such as protection and may set a precedence that may discourage other people from involvement in terror activities to guarantee a long term solution to the problem and benefit the entire society. The argument also provides for evaluation of potential guilt before torture and therefore undermines potential injustice to the suspect but is too subjective and deductive and may not be applicable to real life. Presumption of a suspect’s guild may be a consequence of implicative coincidences and be unjust for the innocent suspect. In addition, torture may not lead to required information, as intelligence based investigations could, leading to occurrence of the subject crime and harm to both targeted victims and the tortured suspect. The argument that aims at preventing crimes such as terror attacks may however succeed in sending a thri lling warning and retrieving information towards its objective. The argument for torturing suspects towards terror prevention may